← Back to context

Comment by kgwgk

3 days ago

> Thats not what I said.

That’s true. What you said is

> But the better argument is that 24% of people saying "it could be justified" is that it actually could be justified.

and I don’t even know how to parse the sentence so I cannot really comment on it.

You implied that 1/3 of muslims would be willing to kill someone over a drawing of Muhammad.

The study doesn't say 1/3 of muslims say "it's ok to kill someone who draws images of Muhammad". It says "acts of violence". A vague and immeasurable term. Does that mean a punch? does it mean a stab? Jihad? The poll doesn't care.

  • > you implied that 1/3 of muslims would be willing to kill…

    I implied no such thing. I was referring only to Palestinians (the 'other bunch'). The vast majority of who will indeed slaughter you if they decide they are offended.

    I'm bemused why anyone thought I was talking about Muslims in say Sarajevo or Indonesia. Identity-obsessed much?