Comment by ok123456
19 hours ago
They have?
They released a Marty Rimm-level report citing that pro-Palestinian was mentioned more than pro-Israeli content in ratios that differed from Meta products. This was the 'smoking gun' of manipulation when it's more of a sign Meta was the one doing the manipulation.
The opinion today has almost nothing to do with how content is controlled on the platform; the court is very clear that they'd have upheld the statute based purely on the data collection issue.
That report was pivotal during the vote for the law and belies the actual interests.
The court addresses that directly, and every member of it, despite agreeing on little else, disagrees with you.
1 reply →
I don't know what Congress has said but there absolutely is evidence that TikTok has been used to spy on users for political reasons. A US based engineer claims that he saw evidence that Hong Kong protestors were spied on in 2018 at the behest of a special committee representing the CCP's interests within ByteDance. This is not surprising, most major corporations within China maintain a special committee representing the government's interests to company executives
https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2023/6/7/china-spied-on-ho...
The DHS does that in the United States.
Every major social media and dating application has a law enforcement portal. This was documented in BlueLeaks.
Do law enforcement portals provide current location information? There's an extended history of the TikTok being used to spy on the location of user devices
https://archive.ph/kt0fY
3 replies →