← Back to context Comment by browningstreet 3 months ago It's also chronically understaffed. 2 comments browningstreet Reply scarface_74 3 months ago That might be true. But the answer isn’t hiring someone with no real world experience. I would hire an entry level developer before I would hire an entry level security person. browningstreet 3 months ago I didn’t mean “understaffed and they need more people and so that’s a great move on OPs part”.I meant “they’ll never hire as many security people as they should have on staff and OP would be wading into low-demand territory”.
scarface_74 3 months ago That might be true. But the answer isn’t hiring someone with no real world experience. I would hire an entry level developer before I would hire an entry level security person. browningstreet 3 months ago I didn’t mean “understaffed and they need more people and so that’s a great move on OPs part”.I meant “they’ll never hire as many security people as they should have on staff and OP would be wading into low-demand territory”.
browningstreet 3 months ago I didn’t mean “understaffed and they need more people and so that’s a great move on OPs part”.I meant “they’ll never hire as many security people as they should have on staff and OP would be wading into low-demand territory”.
That might be true. But the answer isn’t hiring someone with no real world experience. I would hire an entry level developer before I would hire an entry level security person.
I didn’t mean “understaffed and they need more people and so that’s a great move on OPs part”.
I meant “they’ll never hire as many security people as they should have on staff and OP would be wading into low-demand territory”.