Proposed rules would require nutrition info on alcohol labels 20 hours ago (apnews.com) 4 comments geox Reply Add to library BugsJustFindMe 20 hours ago > Similar rules were first proposed nearly two decades agoWhat a farcical state we live in. What possible non-malign reason is there to not require it? Why was this not done nearly two decades ago? dcrazy 19 hours ago It shocked me to learn that alcohol content wasn’t already a required element of alcoholic product labels. Even knowing that alcohol is outside the purview of the FDA, it seems it would at least be relevant for taxation! metalman 13 hours ago Stout wins! It is already classified as food in Ireland, whisky bieng of course, a much more serious endevour.
BugsJustFindMe 20 hours ago > Similar rules were first proposed nearly two decades agoWhat a farcical state we live in. What possible non-malign reason is there to not require it? Why was this not done nearly two decades ago?
dcrazy 19 hours ago It shocked me to learn that alcohol content wasn’t already a required element of alcoholic product labels. Even knowing that alcohol is outside the purview of the FDA, it seems it would at least be relevant for taxation!
metalman 13 hours ago Stout wins! It is already classified as food in Ireland, whisky bieng of course, a much more serious endevour.
> Similar rules were first proposed nearly two decades ago
What a farcical state we live in. What possible non-malign reason is there to not require it? Why was this not done nearly two decades ago?
It shocked me to learn that alcohol content wasn’t already a required element of alcoholic product labels. Even knowing that alcohol is outside the purview of the FDA, it seems it would at least be relevant for taxation!
Stout wins! It is already classified as food in Ireland, whisky bieng of course, a much more serious endevour.