← Back to context

Comment by DaiPlusPlus

2 hours ago

> The problem is that good journalism doesn't have funding.

The BBC and Reuters can be posited as counterexamples to your assertion. They’re good journalists and well-funded (and not primarily by advertising either).

Hmm... but do you think that they would produce such an article, funding the research into it?

From what I can tell, they would report accurately once these findings were published but would not find a researcher to dig into the claims before publishing that someone (named) said that these chips are at fault.