← Back to context

Comment by DaiPlusPlus

13 hours ago

> The problem is that good journalism doesn't have funding.

The BBC and Reuters can be posited as counterexamples to your assertion. They’re good journalists and well-funded (and not primarily by advertising either).

Hmm... but do you think that they would produce such an article, funding the research into it?

From what I can tell, they would report accurately once these findings were published but would not find a researcher to dig into the claims before publishing that someone (named) said that these chips are at fault.

Which firm's journalist was it that just got arrested at a press conference for asking questions about Israel?

BBC is under constant threat of getting defunded, it's almost a meme at this point, and on top of that is generally under constant attack. Reuters doesn't do much local or regional stuff.