Comment by lynndotpy

> User's videos are still legal US speech and can be posted and shared freely.

Sure, but removing the platform still removes speech. This relies on all of the people saving and re-uploading their videos.

Imagine a scenario where you needed government and regulatory approval to create a new website. HackerNews, personal websites, etc. were all banned. Would it be okay, since you could repost all your comments and threads onto Facebook?

> Banning US companies is just politically infeasible. But the Chinese issue is pretty bipartisan (right now).

FOSTA and SESTA impacted US companies. It leakd to increased censorship on practically every social media platform.

The EARN IT Act is still a threat (unless Salt Typhoon, ironically, provided the proof necessary to show how vital e2ee is). It has also enjoyed bipartisan support, and backdooring encryption is harmful and does constitute censorship.

While I agree the legal specifics of the TikTok ban are meant to target TikTok, the political apparatus has been proven. Congress banning apps has been normalized.

No matter how you cut it, this is another big loss for the free and open internet, at a time when wins are far and few between.