← Back to context Comment by readyplayernull 1 year ago Terms of use contract violation? 5 comments readyplayernull Reply hipadev23 1 year ago Robots.txt is completely irrelevant. TOU/TOS are also irrelevant unless you restrict access to only those who have agreed to terms. dredmorbius 1 year ago "By accessing this Site, you acknowledge that you have read, understand, and agree to abide by the terms described herein."<https://www.imperva.com/legal/website-terms-of-use/>Many, many, many hits for this or similar language:<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22By+accessing+this+Site%2C+you+a...>Mind: just because it's written doesn't mean it's enforceable, but to argue that what you've just denied isn't a widely-used premise of online contracts of adhesion fails the simplest empirical test. hipadev23 1 year ago Legal precedent in the US supports what I've stated. 1 reply → bdangubic 1 year ago good thought but zippy chance this holds up in Court
hipadev23 1 year ago Robots.txt is completely irrelevant. TOU/TOS are also irrelevant unless you restrict access to only those who have agreed to terms. dredmorbius 1 year ago "By accessing this Site, you acknowledge that you have read, understand, and agree to abide by the terms described herein."<https://www.imperva.com/legal/website-terms-of-use/>Many, many, many hits for this or similar language:<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22By+accessing+this+Site%2C+you+a...>Mind: just because it's written doesn't mean it's enforceable, but to argue that what you've just denied isn't a widely-used premise of online contracts of adhesion fails the simplest empirical test. hipadev23 1 year ago Legal precedent in the US supports what I've stated. 1 reply →
dredmorbius 1 year ago "By accessing this Site, you acknowledge that you have read, understand, and agree to abide by the terms described herein."<https://www.imperva.com/legal/website-terms-of-use/>Many, many, many hits for this or similar language:<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22By+accessing+this+Site%2C+you+a...>Mind: just because it's written doesn't mean it's enforceable, but to argue that what you've just denied isn't a widely-used premise of online contracts of adhesion fails the simplest empirical test. hipadev23 1 year ago Legal precedent in the US supports what I've stated. 1 reply →
Robots.txt is completely irrelevant. TOU/TOS are also irrelevant unless you restrict access to only those who have agreed to terms.
"By accessing this Site, you acknowledge that you have read, understand, and agree to abide by the terms described herein."
<https://www.imperva.com/legal/website-terms-of-use/>
Many, many, many hits for this or similar language:
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22By+accessing+this+Site%2C+you+a...>
Mind: just because it's written doesn't mean it's enforceable, but to argue that what you've just denied isn't a widely-used premise of online contracts of adhesion fails the simplest empirical test.
Legal precedent in the US supports what I've stated.
1 reply →
good thought but zippy chance this holds up in Court