← Back to context

Comment by okucu

1 year ago

Did you notice any important differences between gitea and forgejo (besides ideology)? Although it seems like forgejo has added actions in the meantime

Gitea also has actions.

https://docs.gitea.com/usage/actions/overview

  • Gitea actually got actions before Forgejo did. That was part of what motivated Forgejo to become a hard fork instead of just a rebrand—there was some sort of disagreement about the way in which actions were rolled out and Forgejo decided from there to stop trying to be fully compatible.

    https://forgejo.org/2024-02-forking-forward/#the-hard-forkin...

    • I've missed that part. AFAIK both are forked from nektos/act and can't be dramatically different. All this story is an unnecessary dichotomy for me. Still hosting production code on a Gitea instance and will happily pay a dime but didn't get why yet.

  • I probably worded that wrong, but that was my point. Forgejo didn't have actions for the longest time, so I was wondering if it "caught" up with gitea

Not a thing. I don’t use actions yet, just the primary repo management UI. I don’t know if I could tell the difference.