← Back to context

Comment by rglullis

1 year ago

> They can live as members of tribes, as evolution intended for us.

Please, quit the cheap sophistry.

Evolution doesn't intend or plan anything for us, and you will have a very hard time convincing people that we would be better off living in a tribal/clan society than whatever we have today.

Evolution intends in the sense that it follows an abstract fitness function. I didn't think I'd have to explain that here. I know how to implement evolution algorithmically.

And no matter what you think about tribal societies, we still live in tribes every day. You and your close friends are a tribe. Your family is a tribe. Forums and now social media communities are tribes. HackerNews is a tribe. Open source projects are tribes, indeed they fork over ideological differences all the time. Political parties are tribes, indeed they split and antagonize each other all the time. Nationalities are tribes. Companies are tribes. Social classes are tribes. Subcultures and "identities" are tribes.

We are not built to handle global contexts, so we collapse them into tribal ones. We do that for everything. There's always an in-group and an out-group and a hierarchy if we're talking about a cluster of people.

  • A tribe assumes a strict hierarchy and mobility only though power and violence.

    I can agree with you about the issue of societies failing to organize themselves past a certain scale, but this is not a problem with "Capitalism".

    • Fair, I used a very loose definition then.

      My issue with capitalism is fundamentally split in three parts: that profit is the driving force behind action; that short term effects are prioritized over long term ones; and that global markets operate at a scale that does not allow individuals to have any real agency in their environment due to the points outlined in the previous comment.

      It just fosters the kind of behavior that goes against my idealized version of what society should be according to my understanding of the conditions in which we thrive.

      i.e. it turns people into selfish venal assholes and it destroys our chances at a better future with each passing day

      Perhaps I'm also using a wrong definition of anarchy then. But it's honestly the closest label I know for this concept. A less centralized society.

      9 replies →