Comment by dathinab
5 months ago
you argument is basically "everything is a political position"
which defeats your original argument because if everything is a political position practically it's no different to nothing being a political position and as such
and sure application of law in practice is never perfect
but that doesn't mean we should allow people to systematically harass others on the internet, or systematically spread misinformation which is intended to cause deformation of whole groups of people, or calls for violence against people or propaganda with the intend to create more violent racism, etc.
If you have the half of the country strongly disagreeing with you, then.. it is. There's no other criteria...
Of course I can only guess we also disagree on what "misinformation", "propaganda" and even "racism" are. So in practice, I can't agree with any of your conclusion.
idk. but in the country I live the majority more or less agrees with my stance, and things are quite similar in a lot of EU countries and this was about EU regulations...