← Back to context

Comment by dullcrisp

1 year ago

I’m saying that if you want to enjoy a city you should find things that you enjoy to do there. If you just show up it’s not surprising that you’ll be unimpressed.

I guess? Seems like a concert for example would be just as fun in a smaller rural venue than a gigantic urban one.

I would enjoy the activity itself without regard of the location. If the city is to be impressive should it not stand on its own?

  • No, that’s what I’m saying. That’s not the point of it. All the buildings aren’t just for show. They’re all functional.

Not sure I agree. Strolling through Paris, New York stopping here and there for a coffee and cake is quite fun I’d say.