← Back to context

Comment by lolinder

6 months ago

This is a change from your response to the comment that I linked to, where you said it was a good point. Why the difference?

Maybe I should clarify that I'm not saying that the effort to enable a new backend is substantial, I'm saying that my understanding of that comment (the one you acknowledged made a good argument) is that the maintenance burden of having a new backend is substantial.

I didn't say it was a good point. I said I disagree, but it's a respectable opinion I could imagine someone having.