← Back to context Comment by anal_reactor 2 months ago [flagged] 3 comments anal_reactor Reply jefftk 2 months ago > if you pointed that out before Trump's electionThis article is an expanded version of the author's reporting a year ago: https://www.tracingwoodgrains.com/p/the-faas-hiring-scandal-...While it didn't make the same splash then, I saw it and didn't see people responding by trying to cancel the author. Khaine 2 months ago Famously this guy James Damore tried to explain why the approach to diversity at google was not going to work. How did that work out for him? jefftk 2 months ago I'm not arguing the obviously false "no one has been cancelled for arguing an approach to increasing diversity is counterproductive". I'm arguing "Trace wouldn't have been (and in fact wasn't) cancelled for writing about this pre-Trump"
jefftk 2 months ago > if you pointed that out before Trump's electionThis article is an expanded version of the author's reporting a year ago: https://www.tracingwoodgrains.com/p/the-faas-hiring-scandal-...While it didn't make the same splash then, I saw it and didn't see people responding by trying to cancel the author. Khaine 2 months ago Famously this guy James Damore tried to explain why the approach to diversity at google was not going to work. How did that work out for him? jefftk 2 months ago I'm not arguing the obviously false "no one has been cancelled for arguing an approach to increasing diversity is counterproductive". I'm arguing "Trace wouldn't have been (and in fact wasn't) cancelled for writing about this pre-Trump"
Khaine 2 months ago Famously this guy James Damore tried to explain why the approach to diversity at google was not going to work. How did that work out for him? jefftk 2 months ago I'm not arguing the obviously false "no one has been cancelled for arguing an approach to increasing diversity is counterproductive". I'm arguing "Trace wouldn't have been (and in fact wasn't) cancelled for writing about this pre-Trump"
jefftk 2 months ago I'm not arguing the obviously false "no one has been cancelled for arguing an approach to increasing diversity is counterproductive". I'm arguing "Trace wouldn't have been (and in fact wasn't) cancelled for writing about this pre-Trump"
> if you pointed that out before Trump's election
This article is an expanded version of the author's reporting a year ago: https://www.tracingwoodgrains.com/p/the-faas-hiring-scandal-...
While it didn't make the same splash then, I saw it and didn't see people responding by trying to cancel the author.
Famously this guy James Damore tried to explain why the approach to diversity at google was not going to work. How did that work out for him?
I'm not arguing the obviously false "no one has been cancelled for arguing an approach to increasing diversity is counterproductive". I'm arguing "Trace wouldn't have been (and in fact wasn't) cancelled for writing about this pre-Trump"