← Back to context Comment by pmlnr 16 days ago No, the government is always exempt. Citizens shouldn't be allowed e2e, the government, that's ok. 3 comments pmlnr Reply selendym 16 days ago The problem with this line of thinking is that the government is, of course, composed of... individual citizens. pmlnr 16 days ago I don't want them to be, they make themselves exempt.It's bad. It's one of the causes that triggered the French Rebellion in 1793: one rule for them, one for us? Kim_Bruning 16 days ago They do seem to think that way sometimes, don't they?But the counter-argument here is: if the civilian E2E apps had also/already been backdoored, they'd be entirely out of options now.
selendym 16 days ago The problem with this line of thinking is that the government is, of course, composed of... individual citizens. pmlnr 16 days ago I don't want them to be, they make themselves exempt.It's bad. It's one of the causes that triggered the French Rebellion in 1793: one rule for them, one for us?
pmlnr 16 days ago I don't want them to be, they make themselves exempt.It's bad. It's one of the causes that triggered the French Rebellion in 1793: one rule for them, one for us?
Kim_Bruning 16 days ago They do seem to think that way sometimes, don't they?But the counter-argument here is: if the civilian E2E apps had also/already been backdoored, they'd be entirely out of options now.
The problem with this line of thinking is that the government is, of course, composed of... individual citizens.
I don't want them to be, they make themselves exempt.
It's bad. It's one of the causes that triggered the French Rebellion in 1793: one rule for them, one for us?
They do seem to think that way sometimes, don't they?
But the counter-argument here is: if the civilian E2E apps had also/already been backdoored, they'd be entirely out of options now.