← Back to context

Comment by paulgb

2 months ago

Wow, that's interesting! I wonder if this reproduces with a different message, or if it was a lucky guess.

I looked at how the strings tokenize and they do appear to conserve enough information that it could be decoded in theory.

> or if it was a lucky guess

It’s like guessing 1/2 or 2/3 on a math test. The test authors pick nice numbers, and programmers like ”hello”. If the way to encode the secret message resembles other encodings, it’s probably that the pattern matching monster picked it up and is struggling to autocomplete (ie backwards rationalize) a reason why.