← Back to context

Comment by detuur

10 months ago

I can't believe you're the first person I find in this conversation who raises this issue. This is the exact reason why Marcan flipped his lid. Linus publicly championed a very technically complex initiative and then left all those contributors to the wolves when things didn't progress without a hiccup. Especially damning when you consider that at every step, the fief lords in Linux have seemingly done everything in their power to set up the r4l people for failure and Linus hasn't so much as squeaked at them. He personally cut the knot and asserted that Rust is Linux's future, but he constantly allows those below him to relitigate the issue with new contributors (who can't fight back because even though they're contributing by the supposed rules, they don't have enough social buy-in).

> He personally cut the knot and asserted that Rust is Linux's future,

When did he say that?

In any event, that could be true (Rust is Linux's future) while the statement "R4L is not in Linux's future" is also true.

IOW, in principle, I may agree with you on something. That doesn't mean I agree with your specific implementation.