> The problem is wokists try to penetrate everything. It’s basically mission impossible to remove them.
Ah yes "they are everywhere"
> Is it over-heavy-handed? Yes. e been a thing in the first place? No.
So being inclusive and introducing new people who have not been exposed to e.g. advanced mathematics is a bad thing?
> Personally, I’d prefer we rebuild 10 years of research from scratch, rather than keep a science that concluded it was ok to perform scientific experimentation on children to a Nazi level.
What are you even talking about? I guess we are now in the phase where people just make sh*t up, but don't pretend you care about children, we have seen how you all defended Gaetz an actual pedophile.
> So being inclusive and introducing new people who have not been exposed to e.g. advanced mathematics is a bad thing?
Your definition of "being inclusive" is controversial and voters (including me) don't agree with that.
Besides, "DEI advisory board" should not exist, we shouldn't fund that.
A catch-all term used to label anything they disagree with. It is also used to describe people they believe are part of the conspiracies they subscribe to
> The problem is wokists try to penetrate everything. It’s basically mission impossible to remove them.
Ah yes "they are everywhere"
> Is it over-heavy-handed? Yes. e been a thing in the first place? No.
So being inclusive and introducing new people who have not been exposed to e.g. advanced mathematics is a bad thing?
> Personally, I’d prefer we rebuild 10 years of research from scratch, rather than keep a science that concluded it was ok to perform scientific experimentation on children to a Nazi level.
What are you even talking about? I guess we are now in the phase where people just make sh*t up, but don't pretend you care about children, we have seen how you all defended Gaetz an actual pedophile.
> So being inclusive and introducing new people who have not been exposed to e.g. advanced mathematics is a bad thing?
Your definition of "being inclusive" is controversial and voters (including me) don't agree with that. Besides, "DEI advisory board" should not exist, we shouldn't fund that.
This is just "reds under the bed" bullshit again. Reconsider.
What is "wokism".
edit: > rather than keep a science that concluded it was ok to perform scientific experimentation on children to a Nazi level.
ah okay, don't bother to reply, no point. I missed that "point" when I asked.
A catch-all term used to label anything they disagree with. It is also used to describe people they believe are part of the conspiracies they subscribe to
[flagged]