In case you were asking genuinely: TDS is "Trump Derangement Syndrome." Generally coined to critique people who are furious with Trump no matter what he does. For instance, one time he ate McDonalds at the white house and there were articles criticizing the event for days. But it's often over-applied by Trump's supporters to dismiss any real criticism (the above being a perfect example).
This reductionist way of thinking isn't doing you or anyone any good. Unless you have at least some circumstantial evidence hinting at that, apart from "someone disagrees with me so they must be x", this isn't providing any value to the discussion.
You should probably address your criticisms to the gp. Giving trolls a pass and wagging fingers at people who reject their specious arguments is an increasingly common failure pattern.
Trolls don't get a pass. But neither do their critics.
You want to criticize a troll? Be my guest. Criticize away. (Or just downvote and flag.) But if you criticize, do better than false accusation. (There's a fine real accusation to make, namely "you're being a troll"; you don't have to make false accusations.)
Be better than the trolls. Don't stoop to their level.
[flagged]
Who cares about security. As long as the libs are crying, right?
[flagged]
What agency is that?
In case you were asking genuinely: TDS is "Trump Derangement Syndrome." Generally coined to critique people who are furious with Trump no matter what he does. For instance, one time he ate McDonalds at the white house and there were articles criticizing the event for days. But it's often over-applied by Trump's supporters to dismiss any real criticism (the above being a perfect example).
2 replies →
[flagged]
This reductionist way of thinking isn't doing you or anyone any good. Unless you have at least some circumstantial evidence hinting at that, apart from "someone disagrees with me so they must be x", this isn't providing any value to the discussion.
You should probably address your criticisms to the gp. Giving trolls a pass and wagging fingers at people who reject their specious arguments is an increasingly common failure pattern.
Trolls don't get a pass. But neither do their critics.
You want to criticize a troll? Be my guest. Criticize away. (Or just downvote and flag.) But if you criticize, do better than false accusation. (There's a fine real accusation to make, namely "you're being a troll"; you don't have to make false accusations.)
Be better than the trolls. Don't stoop to their level.
1 reply →
Their reasoning was "well google also has bugs", comparing their bounty system to an embarrassing security mistake.