You're answering to a post I made saying that prices that were quoted from the Lazard report don't reflect all that's writen in the report.
Your answer gives a model unrelated to the figures I was discussing, with extremely agressive prices [1] set as hypotheses and zero network costs factored in. Sure, I can accept it as a minimum limit for the cost of a system, but that's not a very useful information, and you're not quoting this price as a lower limit either.
I don't see an honesty issue here, just someone believing that spherical cows are going to produce milk tomorrow.
[1]: e.g. the Lazard report quotes utility PV at $29-92/MWh, while your tool quotes it at 21.7€/MWh.
You don't have to go that far, but you could at least listen honestly to what that model, and what more complex models, are telling you.
You're answering to a post I made saying that prices that were quoted from the Lazard report don't reflect all that's writen in the report.
Your answer gives a model unrelated to the figures I was discussing, with extremely agressive prices [1] set as hypotheses and zero network costs factored in. Sure, I can accept it as a minimum limit for the cost of a system, but that's not a very useful information, and you're not quoting this price as a lower limit either.
I don't see an honesty issue here, just someone believing that spherical cows are going to produce milk tomorrow.
[1]: e.g. the Lazard report quotes utility PV at $29-92/MWh, while your tool quotes it at 21.7€/MWh.