← Back to context Comment by roenxi 4 months ago They work if light is massively cut down for 12 months. And can be fortified to the nth degree. 4 comments roenxi Reply pfdietz 4 months ago This has to be the most hilariously desperate anti-renewable argument yet. roenxi 4 months ago In what way is it anti-renewable? pfdietz 4 months ago "Renewables (or, at least, PV) are bad because they won't work after a K/Pg-level asteroid impact." 1 reply →
pfdietz 4 months ago This has to be the most hilariously desperate anti-renewable argument yet. roenxi 4 months ago In what way is it anti-renewable? pfdietz 4 months ago "Renewables (or, at least, PV) are bad because they won't work after a K/Pg-level asteroid impact." 1 reply →
roenxi 4 months ago In what way is it anti-renewable? pfdietz 4 months ago "Renewables (or, at least, PV) are bad because they won't work after a K/Pg-level asteroid impact." 1 reply →
pfdietz 4 months ago "Renewables (or, at least, PV) are bad because they won't work after a K/Pg-level asteroid impact." 1 reply →
This has to be the most hilariously desperate anti-renewable argument yet.
In what way is it anti-renewable?
"Renewables (or, at least, PV) are bad because they won't work after a K/Pg-level asteroid impact."
1 reply →