← Back to context

Comment by sejje

10 months ago

You haven't addressed the argument (riskiness of the activity) with your anecdote.

That was his point, or if it wasn't it's my point. It's a physical activity, one that from my POV improves health much more than reduces it. Take the hypothetical where he doesn't ever find a replacement activity, and instead of being fit becomes obese and depressed. that would be worse for society than mountain biking wouldn't it?

For society only; what's the TCO of a mountain biking injury times the rate of injuries, over the TCO of obesity and depression times the likelihood a sedentary lifestyle results?

without access to that data, his anecdote does appear to be a stronger argument than literally no data, no?