> Most likely this involves scrubbing any personal data whenever possible, or anonymising it whenever it's not.
Don’t you think it’s a problem you can’t say this with certainty or point to an authority who has assured us this, and there’s no way to verify if it’s true because theres’s no oversight of DOGE?
Would you tolerate such uncertainty from even a SaaS provider? Why should we tolerate it from our government?
So an organization is massively accessing sensitive government data on citizens without transparency or safeguards?
Hence why people are reacting negatively.
[flagged]
Where can we learn this information?
> Most likely this involves scrubbing any personal data whenever possible, or anonymising it whenever it's not.
Don’t you think it’s a problem you can’t say this with certainty or point to an authority who has assured us this, and there’s no way to verify if it’s true because theres’s no oversight of DOGE?
Would you tolerate such uncertainty from even a SaaS provider? Why should we tolerate it from our government?
Has nothing to do with time pressure. They are actively fighting against transparency that doesn’t fit their narrative.
Move fast and kill things?
Awesome, so everything is trust based with 2 of the most untrustworthy people on the planet.
Phew, and I was worried for a second...
Edit: to the down voters, go do some basic fact checking for Trump and Musk tweets and then we'll talk.