← Back to context Comment by causal 2 days ago Are you saying it cannot move faster than they because of some kind of governor? 4 comments causal Reply Symmetry 2 days ago A governor, the firmware in the motor controllers, something like that. Certainly not the neural network though. UltraSane 2 days ago That is how I would design it. It is common in safety critical PLC systems to have 1 or more separate safety PLCs that try to prevent bad things from happening. idiotsecant 1 day ago Although in a SIL safety system the dangerous events are identified and extremely thoroughly characterized as part of system design.There cannot be a safety system of this type for a generalist platform like a humanoid robot. It's possibility space is just too high.I think the safety governor in this case would have to be a neural network that is at least as complex as the robots network, if not more so.Which begs the question: what system checks that one for safety? UltraSane 1 day ago Limiting max force applied CAN be can be characterized for this robot.
Symmetry 2 days ago A governor, the firmware in the motor controllers, something like that. Certainly not the neural network though.
UltraSane 2 days ago That is how I would design it. It is common in safety critical PLC systems to have 1 or more separate safety PLCs that try to prevent bad things from happening. idiotsecant 1 day ago Although in a SIL safety system the dangerous events are identified and extremely thoroughly characterized as part of system design.There cannot be a safety system of this type for a generalist platform like a humanoid robot. It's possibility space is just too high.I think the safety governor in this case would have to be a neural network that is at least as complex as the robots network, if not more so.Which begs the question: what system checks that one for safety? UltraSane 1 day ago Limiting max force applied CAN be can be characterized for this robot.
idiotsecant 1 day ago Although in a SIL safety system the dangerous events are identified and extremely thoroughly characterized as part of system design.There cannot be a safety system of this type for a generalist platform like a humanoid robot. It's possibility space is just too high.I think the safety governor in this case would have to be a neural network that is at least as complex as the robots network, if not more so.Which begs the question: what system checks that one for safety? UltraSane 1 day ago Limiting max force applied CAN be can be characterized for this robot.
A governor, the firmware in the motor controllers, something like that. Certainly not the neural network though.
That is how I would design it. It is common in safety critical PLC systems to have 1 or more separate safety PLCs that try to prevent bad things from happening.
Although in a SIL safety system the dangerous events are identified and extremely thoroughly characterized as part of system design.
There cannot be a safety system of this type for a generalist platform like a humanoid robot. It's possibility space is just too high.
I think the safety governor in this case would have to be a neural network that is at least as complex as the robots network, if not more so.
Which begs the question: what system checks that one for safety?
Limiting max force applied CAN be can be characterized for this robot.