Comment by alabastervlog

> somehow, leave a bunch of people going "I dunno, seems OK" or "eh, it's not a big deal" is growing longer every day

The death of morality by a thousand tiny social cuts. The human fear of peer-rejection is deeply embedded, and with enough time... Well, no cult becomes successful without doing that.

To quote some advice on corrupting a man from senior devil Screwtape:

> No doubt he must very soon realise that his own faith is in direct opposition to the assumptions on which all the conversation of his new friends is based. I don’t think that matters much provided that you can persuade him to postpone any open acknowledgment of the fact, and this, with the aid of shame, pride, modesty and vanity, will be easy to do. As long as the postponement lasts he will be in a false position. He will be silent when he ought to speak and laugh when he ought to be silent. He will assume, at first only by his manner, but presently by his words, all sorts of cynical and sceptical attitudes which are not really his. But if you play him well, they may become his. All mortals tend to turn into the thing they are pretending to be. This is elementary.[...]

> Sooner or later, however, the real nature of his new friends must become clear to him, and then your tactics must depend on the patient’s intelligence. If he is a big enough fool you can get him to realise the character of the friends only while they are absent; their presence can be made to sweep away all criticism. If this succeeds, he can be induced to live, as I have known many humans live, for quite long periods, two parallel lives; he will not only appear to be, but actually be, a different man in each of the circles he frequents.

> Failing this, there is a subtler and more entertaining method. He can be made to take a positive pleasure in the perception that the two sides of his life are inconsistent. This is done by exploiting his vanity. [...] You see the idea—the worldly friends touch him on one side and the [religious colleague] on the other, and he is the complete, balanced, complex man who sees round them all. Thus, while being permanently treacherous to at least two sets of people, he will feel, instead of shame, a continual undercurrent of self-satisfaction.

-- Screwtape, senior devil, in The Screwtape Letters by C.S. Lewis

Over-indulgence of misinformation led to this.

Yeah, to me, there is no benefit of the doubt. Musk supports AfD, which seems to this American about as Nazi a party is as legally allowed in Germany. He has, of course, reinstated all kinds of far right voice to his shitty little social media platform, while simultaneously banning anyone/anything he deems too woke. Then, bro pulls a full fledged Nazi salute on national TV.

I don't know if it is appropriate to call Musk a Nazi: that term is so rooted in a specific era and place. I would certainly call Musk a neo-fascist, just as I would call Trump a neo-fascist, and also the entirety of his cabinet:

-an EO declaring that Trump's interpretation of the law is the only valid one for anyone in the Executive Branch (https://www.jurist.org/news/2025/02/trump-signs-order-declar...)

-ex post facto vetos (by DOGE fiat) of money previously apportioned by Congress

-the abandonment of Ukraine, while carving it up with Russia for land and mineral rights, and lying about the causes for the conflict.

-the undermining of NATO and bolstering of Russia (https://www.ft.com/content/ac1dcb02-4c5f-4a36-935a-f7ef0a934...)

-firing of inspectors general (https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/24/us/politics/trump-fires-i...)

-firing of election security teams (https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/20/business/trump-foreign-in...)

-vows of retribution against political opponents and weaponization of the DOJ (https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/this-is-not-restoring-...)

This is an terrifying consolidation of power in complete violation of the intent of the American Constitution. Welcome to neo-fascist America.