Comment by anonymous_user9
3 days ago
Regular government employees only have access to the systems they need to do their job, so they are, in fact, different.
3 days ago
Regular government employees only have access to the systems they need to do their job, so they are, in fact, different.
You don’t think anyone else has root?
I'm gonna go out on a limb and say no, not without first going through a change management process and going through a privileged session management system, except in the case of an emergency break-glass scenario where using those emergency creds throws all kinds of big DANGER alerts across the org if the access was unexpected. I can't speak to the Treasury and IRS specifically, but that's kinda standard across large orgs, especially ones that get audited regularly on their handling of sensitive data.
Some system protect against that. The philosophy behind IBM RACF is :《 A key security principle is the separation of duties between different users so that no one person has sufficient access privilege to perpetrate damaging fraud.》
> The philosophy behind IBM RACF is :《 A key security principle is the separation of duties between different users so that no one person has sufficient access privilege to perpetrate damaging fraud.》
I am so primed to parse emoticons eagerly that I thought that the philosophy was :《
[flagged]