Comment by foxglacier

The fact that religion is common doesn’t mean it has a purpose or that it’s a good idea. Everybody with eyes has blood vessels in front of their retinas even though it’s a bad design with no advantage over having them in the back.

There has never been a long-lived society with internet before. It must not be possible.

>Even modern western atheists treat other ideologies like religions.

They don't, though. This is a commonly believed fallacy, rooted in the presumption that atheists are essentially hypocrites or blind to religious belief being immutably ingrained into human behavior. But the way atheists approach these "ideologies" is nothing like the way religious people approach religion.

>Perhaps it provides comfort and a feeling of security, or provides a purpose when pure pragmatism would reveal that there's no point in living.

Another commonly believed fallacy, that atheism means "pure pragmatism" and that only religion can provide a sense of meaning to life.

Atheists are actually capable of emotions, and empathy, and morality, and finding value in the world and their own lives, just like anyone else. They aren't insects or Vulcans or sociopaths. To quote Douglas Adams, "Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?"

>Maybe people with other higher purposes don't take to it so readily but not everyone has the luxury of, say, a successful career.

This is a new one. Atheism is a luxury of wealthy elites? No, atheists exist at every point of the social and economic ladder, and there are even atheists in foxholes, despite the quip.

>You might have been brainwashed into believing that religion is caused by brainwashing.

I'm not going to call it brainwashing but the knee-jerk animosity from a lot of theists towards the very concept of a life not centered around and entirely defined by belief certainly seems like fear of committing thoughtcrime.