There is plenty of human in the article. I suspect your ai-detector senses are heightened due to the content, and the writing style is mostly straightforward with a few needless flowery words, which makes it ripe for false detection.
But when I re-read it with "did AI write this?" in mind, there's plenty of stuff in there that I would find it rather difficult to get an LLM to write if I tried.
There is plenty of human in the article. I suspect your ai-detector senses are heightened due to the content, and the writing style is mostly straightforward with a few needless flowery words, which makes it ripe for false detection.
But when I re-read it with "did AI write this?" in mind, there's plenty of stuff in there that I would find it rather difficult to get an LLM to write if I tried.