← Back to context

Comment by mattmaroon

4 months ago

It doesn’t and advocating for that is sensible. Advocating for exposing private data because we don’t feel the amount they paid is fair, even when they’ve not been accused of crime, is not.

The data suggestion was "if unregulated, unelected, unsupervised, and unvetted doge folks get and hoard all this data then we should at least make it public".

I don't know if I agree with that but you're arguing against something else.