Comment by pintxo
1 day ago
Funny that people focus on the „Schedule a“ part, when the actual problem is the worst form of regulatory capture this seems to be by the looks: the regulated industry simply taking over the regulator.
1 day ago
Funny that people focus on the „Schedule a“ part, when the actual problem is the worst form of regulatory capture this seems to be by the looks: the regulated industry simply taking over the regulator.
Whoever wrote the schedule A line intended to mislead, rather than inform. So I can’t trust that the other material here isn’t misconstrued.
It is. The article full of innuendo seemingly linking personnel reductions at FAA with recent catastrophes. While they don't say it explicitly they write it so that the casual reader would conclude those ate related events. They also call the new employees "not fully vetted" while not specifying which vetting is needed and knowing they are seasoned competent professionals who held multiple positions of trust. Again, creating an impression of impropriety without any substance to back it up.