← Back to context

Comment by morgante

2 days ago

That's not true.

Look at USAID: they canceled everything, but there was a significant outcry about PEPFAR specifically. Now PEPFAR is back, and likely to stay.

I sincerely don't understand what this proves. You're citing an example of them making a bad cut and having to reverse it. What part of that is an improvement?

  • we get the whole US AID budget back, aside from PEPFAR. it's a good example of a case where they cut too much and undid some cuts.