← Back to context Comment by unocard 10 months ago [flagged] 23 comments unocard Reply dyauspitr 10 months ago [flagged] gcau 10 months ago People have very differing and fluid definitions of fascism. bilbo0s 10 months ago [flagged] 6 replies → ls612 10 months ago People who make violent threats to their political opponents in a democracy should be dealt with violently by the state. computerthings 10 months ago Fascists aren't "political opponents in a democracy", anymore than a burglar is a guest in your home just because they are located in your home. throwawa14223 10 months ago So should communists. unocard 10 months ago [flagged] bdcravens 10 months ago [flagged] Xunjin 10 months ago You must be joking... So if someone spread racist ideas, is not racism? 3 replies → tomrod 10 months ago [flagged] foxygen 10 months ago The Supreme Court Justice is banning people, not the platform owners... dyauspitr 10 months ago [flagged] 1 reply → bdcravens 10 months ago Apples and oranges. This isn't a platform banning individual users; this is a government banning an entire platform.
dyauspitr 10 months ago [flagged] gcau 10 months ago People have very differing and fluid definitions of fascism. bilbo0s 10 months ago [flagged] 6 replies → ls612 10 months ago People who make violent threats to their political opponents in a democracy should be dealt with violently by the state. computerthings 10 months ago Fascists aren't "political opponents in a democracy", anymore than a burglar is a guest in your home just because they are located in your home. throwawa14223 10 months ago So should communists. unocard 10 months ago [flagged] bdcravens 10 months ago [flagged] Xunjin 10 months ago You must be joking... So if someone spread racist ideas, is not racism? 3 replies →
gcau 10 months ago People have very differing and fluid definitions of fascism. bilbo0s 10 months ago [flagged] 6 replies →
ls612 10 months ago People who make violent threats to their political opponents in a democracy should be dealt with violently by the state. computerthings 10 months ago Fascists aren't "political opponents in a democracy", anymore than a burglar is a guest in your home just because they are located in your home.
computerthings 10 months ago Fascists aren't "political opponents in a democracy", anymore than a burglar is a guest in your home just because they are located in your home.
bdcravens 10 months ago [flagged] Xunjin 10 months ago You must be joking... So if someone spread racist ideas, is not racism? 3 replies →
Xunjin 10 months ago You must be joking... So if someone spread racist ideas, is not racism? 3 replies →
tomrod 10 months ago [flagged] foxygen 10 months ago The Supreme Court Justice is banning people, not the platform owners... dyauspitr 10 months ago [flagged] 1 reply → bdcravens 10 months ago Apples and oranges. This isn't a platform banning individual users; this is a government banning an entire platform.
foxygen 10 months ago The Supreme Court Justice is banning people, not the platform owners... dyauspitr 10 months ago [flagged] 1 reply →
bdcravens 10 months ago Apples and oranges. This isn't a platform banning individual users; this is a government banning an entire platform.
[flagged]
People have very differing and fluid definitions of fascism.
[flagged]
6 replies →
People who make violent threats to their political opponents in a democracy should be dealt with violently by the state.
Fascists aren't "political opponents in a democracy", anymore than a burglar is a guest in your home just because they are located in your home.
So should communists.
[flagged]
[flagged]
You must be joking... So if someone spread racist ideas, is not racism?
3 replies →
[flagged]
The Supreme Court Justice is banning people, not the platform owners...
[flagged]
1 reply →
Apples and oranges. This isn't a platform banning individual users; this is a government banning an entire platform.