← Back to context Comment by unocard 1 year ago [flagged] 23 comments unocard Reply dyauspitr 1 year ago [flagged] gcau 1 year ago People have very differing and fluid definitions of fascism. bilbo0s 1 year ago [flagged] 6 replies → ls612 1 year ago People who make violent threats to their political opponents in a democracy should be dealt with violently by the state. computerthings 1 year ago Fascists aren't "political opponents in a democracy", anymore than a burglar is a guest in your home just because they are located in your home. throwawa14223 1 year ago So should communists. unocard 1 year ago [flagged] bdcravens 1 year ago [flagged] Xunjin 1 year ago You must be joking... So if someone spread racist ideas, is not racism? 3 replies → tomrod 1 year ago [flagged] foxygen 1 year ago The Supreme Court Justice is banning people, not the platform owners... dyauspitr 1 year ago [flagged] 1 reply → bdcravens 1 year ago Apples and oranges. This isn't a platform banning individual users; this is a government banning an entire platform.
dyauspitr 1 year ago [flagged] gcau 1 year ago People have very differing and fluid definitions of fascism. bilbo0s 1 year ago [flagged] 6 replies → ls612 1 year ago People who make violent threats to their political opponents in a democracy should be dealt with violently by the state. computerthings 1 year ago Fascists aren't "political opponents in a democracy", anymore than a burglar is a guest in your home just because they are located in your home. throwawa14223 1 year ago So should communists. unocard 1 year ago [flagged] bdcravens 1 year ago [flagged] Xunjin 1 year ago You must be joking... So if someone spread racist ideas, is not racism? 3 replies →
gcau 1 year ago People have very differing and fluid definitions of fascism. bilbo0s 1 year ago [flagged] 6 replies →
ls612 1 year ago People who make violent threats to their political opponents in a democracy should be dealt with violently by the state. computerthings 1 year ago Fascists aren't "political opponents in a democracy", anymore than a burglar is a guest in your home just because they are located in your home.
computerthings 1 year ago Fascists aren't "political opponents in a democracy", anymore than a burglar is a guest in your home just because they are located in your home.
bdcravens 1 year ago [flagged] Xunjin 1 year ago You must be joking... So if someone spread racist ideas, is not racism? 3 replies →
Xunjin 1 year ago You must be joking... So if someone spread racist ideas, is not racism? 3 replies →
tomrod 1 year ago [flagged] foxygen 1 year ago The Supreme Court Justice is banning people, not the platform owners... dyauspitr 1 year ago [flagged] 1 reply → bdcravens 1 year ago Apples and oranges. This isn't a platform banning individual users; this is a government banning an entire platform.
foxygen 1 year ago The Supreme Court Justice is banning people, not the platform owners... dyauspitr 1 year ago [flagged] 1 reply →
bdcravens 1 year ago Apples and oranges. This isn't a platform banning individual users; this is a government banning an entire platform.
[flagged]
People have very differing and fluid definitions of fascism.
[flagged]
6 replies →
People who make violent threats to their political opponents in a democracy should be dealt with violently by the state.
Fascists aren't "political opponents in a democracy", anymore than a burglar is a guest in your home just because they are located in your home.
So should communists.
[flagged]
[flagged]
You must be joking... So if someone spread racist ideas, is not racism?
3 replies →
[flagged]
The Supreme Court Justice is banning people, not the platform owners...
[flagged]
1 reply →
Apples and oranges. This isn't a platform banning individual users; this is a government banning an entire platform.