← Back to context

Comment by hinkley

4 months ago

Okay but… it looks like he made 9 times as many commits as the second most frequent committer and 6 times as many as the top two combined. Who do you suppose he should hand it off to?

This smells like a “nobody appreciates how much I’ve been carrying this project” situation. That complicates things.

> Who do you suppose he should hand it off to?

Like I said, anyone would be better than nobody.

  • No, absolutely not. That's precisely how you end up with bad actors inserting malware into FOSS projects they've taken over.

    If a maintainer doesn't want to continue a project, and there's no existing contributor who has demonstrated both the qualifications and interest in taking over a project, the responsible thing to do is archive it – not give committer rights to some rando.

    In the future, if someone else wants to take a stab at continuing the project, they can fork it. Crucially that moves the project to a different namespace – as it absolutely should, for security reasons.

    • Fair point. However, officially announcing the end of the project is not too much to ask.