← Back to context Comment by bawolff 1 year ago Well there is always alternative number 3 - dont use perovskites. 2 comments bawolff Reply westurner 1 year ago Organic solar cell: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_solar_cell :> 19.3%Perovskite solar cell: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perovskite_solar_cell :> 29.8% einpoklum 1 year ago If you need to use ~1.5x more area, but you avoid leaking any heavy metals or similarly toxic materials - I would say that's a win.Of course, there are other parameters to consider.
westurner 1 year ago Organic solar cell: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_solar_cell :> 19.3%Perovskite solar cell: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perovskite_solar_cell :> 29.8% einpoklum 1 year ago If you need to use ~1.5x more area, but you avoid leaking any heavy metals or similarly toxic materials - I would say that's a win.Of course, there are other parameters to consider.
einpoklum 1 year ago If you need to use ~1.5x more area, but you avoid leaking any heavy metals or similarly toxic materials - I would say that's a win.Of course, there are other parameters to consider.
Organic solar cell: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_solar_cell :
> 19.3%
Perovskite solar cell: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perovskite_solar_cell :
> 29.8%
If you need to use ~1.5x more area, but you avoid leaking any heavy metals or similarly toxic materials - I would say that's a win.
Of course, there are other parameters to consider.