Comment by ellen364
9 months ago
> It's not about Cloudflare, it's about the millions of people in Spain who couldn't access a plethora of legitimate, unrelated websites and services because of the block.
I happen to agree that La Liga wildly overreaching is on brand. But I think this is partly about Cloudflare.
What's happening is a reminder of how centralised the internet is becoming. If blocking Cloudflare IPs brings down big chunks of the internet for Spain, that's a problem. Cloudflare could go down for a while, or collapse permanently, or get compromised.
Putting aside my opinions on La Liga overreach, it will also be a problem if companies get to say to courts "Oh, well, if you block those IPs the internet goes down for your country, so let us know what you want to block and maybe we'll get around to it."
Cloudflare might get a resolution from the court that suits them in the short-term. But drawing this to government attention might not suit them in the long run.
> Putting aside my opinions on La Liga overreach, it will also be a problem if companies get to say to courts "Oh, well, if you block those IPs the internet goes down for your country, so let us know what you want to block and maybe we'll get around to it."
On the contrary, it would be an excellent outcome if the Internet became all-or-nothing, and countries could either choose to provide Internet access or block the entire Internet, with zero ability to selectively block things they don't like.
Doing that via a few centralized CDNs would be bad. Doing that at the protocol level would be excellent.
So... you don't agree with the existence of laws? And differing jurisdictions?
I would like it to be impossible to selectively block portions of the Internet. I would like it to not be an option available to anyone.
9 replies →