← Back to context Comment by bornfreddy 2 months ago Maybe. But now I'm really curious how bad that schema must be for them to hide it so viciously. 4 comments bornfreddy Reply jrochkind1 2 months ago I think it's just an excuse to avoid making it feasible for the public to get the data. duxup 2 months ago Your imagination can't cover how bad you might think it is (and yet it isn't that bad).Or at least I don't want to explain to "20 years later Monday Morning Quarterback". michaelmrose 2 months ago Used to be relevant data was in a document but much is no stored in specialized web apps whose data in turn is stored in a db. hot_gril 2 months ago Maybe their schema has triggers and stuff
jrochkind1 2 months ago I think it's just an excuse to avoid making it feasible for the public to get the data.
duxup 2 months ago Your imagination can't cover how bad you might think it is (and yet it isn't that bad).Or at least I don't want to explain to "20 years later Monday Morning Quarterback".
michaelmrose 2 months ago Used to be relevant data was in a document but much is no stored in specialized web apps whose data in turn is stored in a db.
I think it's just an excuse to avoid making it feasible for the public to get the data.
Your imagination can't cover how bad you might think it is (and yet it isn't that bad).
Or at least I don't want to explain to "20 years later Monday Morning Quarterback".
Used to be relevant data was in a document but much is no stored in specialized web apps whose data in turn is stored in a db.
Maybe their schema has triggers and stuff