I'm not OP but I do similar stuff. I pay for Claude's basic tier, OpenAI's $200 tier, and Gemini ultra-super-advanced I get for free because I work there.
I combine all the 'slop' from the three of them in to Gemini (1 or 2 M context window) and have it distill the valuable stuff in there to a good final-enough product.
Doing so has got me a lot of kudos and applause from those I work with.
Wow, that's eye-opening. So, just to be clear, you're paying for Claude and OpenAI out of your own pocket, and using the results at your Google job? We live in interesting times, for sure. :)
So you are basically doing a first pass with diverse models and second pass catches contradictions and other issues? It could help with hallucinations.
I'm not OP but I do similar stuff. I pay for Claude's basic tier, OpenAI's $200 tier, and Gemini ultra-super-advanced I get for free because I work there.
I combine all the 'slop' from the three of them in to Gemini (1 or 2 M context window) and have it distill the valuable stuff in there to a good final-enough product.
Doing so has got me a lot of kudos and applause from those I work with.
Wow, that's eye-opening. So, just to be clear, you're paying for Claude and OpenAI out of your own pocket, and using the results at your Google job? We live in interesting times, for sure. :)
No no, that would get me fired.
So you are basically doing a first pass with diverse models and second pass catches contradictions and other issues? It could help with hallucinations.
For which work tasks do you find this workflow useful, given that you can't feed confidential information into the non-Gemini models?
I do that for non-work tasks, like comparing notes on financial schemes or career growth ideas.
For work tasks, there are several different variants of Gemini that are tuned for different things, just as OpenAI has.
1 reply →