Comment by attentive
5 months ago
given 3.5 and 3.7 cost the same, it doesn't make sense to use 3.5 here.
I'd like to see that benchmark, but R1 + 3.7 should be cheaper than 3.7T + 3.7
5 months ago
given 3.5 and 3.7 cost the same, it doesn't make sense to use 3.5 here.
I'd like to see that benchmark, but R1 + 3.7 should be cheaper than 3.7T + 3.7
The reason 3.5 (as the editor) makes more sense to me is the edit format success rate (99.6% vs 3.7's 93.3%).
Flash 2.0 got 100% on the edit format, and it's extremely cheap, so I'm pretty curious how that would score.