Comment by neilv
2 months ago
Thanks. I might be misinterpreting, but maybe the standard for what's "research" involves not presuming that a given request can be satisfied by a database query?
So if you ask for documents in a way that sounds more complex than "every inspection report ever done on Mel's Diner", which is something they might be able to satisfy reasonably using a paper filing system or by eyeballing rows on a screen, then the request could be denied as "research"?
So then is what the petitioner in this case looking for was a database schema that would let them say, "respectfully, I think it's not research; I think it can be satisfied with the following exact SQL query"?
Exactly.
The public body could then say "no, we're not going to run that query or dig into that database". But then you can take them to court, and you'll probably win if the query is reasonable and simple enough.