← Back to context

Comment by cc101

16 days ago

[flagged]

Could you explain that? Absent other context (i.e. a broader collection of works demonstrating some bias) I'm not understanding how this poster can possibly demonstrate "offensive racial and cultural bigotry".

  • If it had been two Asian girls, it would not have invoked the image of non-Asian people lacking respect for Asians. This image encourages hostility and even bigotry among Asians.

    Schadenfreude does not require both parties to be different in some meaningful way. The poster confuses schadenfreude with cultural bigotry in which schadenfreude may play a non-essential roll.

Really? Assuming that one doesn't fixate obsessively on race for the sake of trying to hunt down perceived offense wherever possible, the poster should just be viewed as that of one human being laughing at the misfortune of another, without condescendingly assuming that because the weeping girl is Asian (not "oriental", since you're nailed so firmly to proper racial nuance), she must immediately be a victim and worthy of special consideration.

What a sick little mentality, that of viewing all human interaction through the lens of what ethnicity or race is shown and how that frames any context.