Comment by wkat4242
2 months ago
It's because it stores the files there so you can sync them with other permissions. And also that your notes aren't deleted like they would be if they were stored in the internal app storage. There's more granular options for filesystem access available but if you implement them you limit yourself to the latest Android releases.
According to Exodus it has no trackers and it's an open source app also so you can see what it does (though tbh I didn't check that for the mobile one)
If there's apps to call out there's way worse than Obsidian.
Obsidian isn't open source by most reports.
Surely Obsidian do not to see all files on the device, it only really needs to see the files the user needs it to see.
> Obsidian isn't open source by most reports.
On FreeBSD I can build a full copy from source (in fact I have to, there is no binary package). The only issue seems to be licensing, not source availability. Personally I don't care about licensing (I completely ignore it all anyway) and it doesn't stop you from inspecting the source code.
I think Obsidian is a really great package, I just happened to have moved over from OneNote which is horrible Microsoft mediocrity and doesn't even have a Linux app. And the web version is really useless, it needs to refresh every day and it can only search within the same tab, not a whole notebook. Such a mess. Obsidian is so quick and efficient <3 And there is full self-hosted syncing available, which I also use.
Obsidian on Android source seems not available. Even generally the reports seems that source is not available.
May be the freebsd build is using some binary library packages?
A cursory search indicates that one of the freebsd 'build-scripts' used for installing obsidian uses a binary package for obsidian itself, not building it from source.
It strange that about obsidian which seems to be rather popular here has many people thinking that it is open source, when it is not.
2 replies →
There isn't a permission for that though - it's all or nothing. I agree that it should be more granular; each app should really have its own scoped file storage area by default, with "access anything" being reserved for file browsers, backup software, etc.
Android already has support for scoped storage. So it is not clear why Obisidian needs the whole file system permission.
2 replies →