Comment by Xelynega

Sorry if you read my post as snarky - I don't think I missed that point, I meant the question at the end more as food for thought.

The OP contrasts adding fluroide to water vs. not adding fluoride to water and brings up the freedom question. I find that very interesting. But he omits that there's also the variant I sketched, namely that fluoride could still be made available to the population, but not through water.

Now, how does this factoid relate to the freedom (positive or negative) question?

So, please don't read my post as negative, my intent was to bring an additional perspective to the table.