Comment by petesergeant
10 days ago
Yep, that's exactly what it's saying. I wrote it because people kept asking me how I was getting ChatGPT to do things, and the answer is: I'm not. Not everything is obvious to everyone. As to why it went straight to the top, I think people resonate with the title, and dislike the buzziness around everything being described as an agent.
Honestly, I still don't understand the message you're conveying.
So you're saying that ChatGPT helped you write the business logic, but it didn't write 100% of it?
Is that your insight?
Or that it didn't help you write any business logic at all and we shouldn't allow it to help us write business logic as well? Is that what you're trying to tell us?
> So you're saying that ChatGPT helped you write the business logic, but it didn't write 100% of it?
ChatGPT didn't write any business logic, and I'm really struggling to see how you got there from reading the article. The message is: don't use LLMs to execute any logic.
Too late. I've already asked it to implement logic and that code is in production used by millions of people. Seems to have worked fine.
I disagree with your conclusion and I don't understand why people upvoted this article to the top of HN.
4 replies →