← Back to context

Comment by Suppafly

8 days ago

> People will frequently say that downvoting is not for disagreeing

Those people are wrong.

Downvoting pushes peoples comments down and greys them out, effectively silencing them. It creates echo chambers.

I reserve my downvotes for when arguments are made in bad faith, rely on logical fallacies, or present know-false information as an argument.

If someone presents an argument on something I disagree with, but it's made in good faith and is well-structured, it deserves an upvote, even if I still disagree afterwards.

  • Your very comment is now downvoted but not silenced. We all see it, as we do every grey comment, as long as one works their way down the comments page. Not every comment is going to be agreed with and rise above the fold, and that’s ok.

    • So you understand how echo chambers are created and are fine with it?

      The problem is that there is no one with power here that can come to the "little guy's" defence. There is no will around here for that kind of support, because the only people hired to wield such power are of like mind. DJT doesn't hire democrats, and this is no different.

      Look at this comment section, and tell me this isn't an echo chamber.

      2 replies →

  • >Downvoting pushes peoples comments down and greys them out

    I don't see how that's a problem. People that agree with them can upvote them and ungrey them out and push them back up.