Comment by dhosek
2 days ago
It’s all part of an ideological attempt to stymie the ability of government to work effectively and then point to how government doesn’t work effectively to justify funneling money to politically connected contractors. It’s the modern version of patronage except that instead of getting jobs for the people in your clan, you get massive contracts for your donors which can be structured so that they’ll still be making money even if you don’t win re-election.
Of course there are some people like that, but if what you say were true I would expect to see wages go up significantly under the Blue Team and then fall back to low levels under the Red Team, yet that doesn't tend to happen. My whole life it's been consistently true that government salaries are much lower, but some people take them because they offer a lot of stability, great benefits, and often a pretty easy/laidback job compared to private industry.
Alas, the democrats have largely ceded the idea the idea that the government can do things as well and they fail to do things like fight for civil service wages that can attract the best employees.
I'll be honest this "conservatives hate the government so they don't fund it then they point to how bad it is as an excuse to cut it further" seems tautological and pretty intellectually lazy.
I've contracted onsite for both state and federal governments. Government employees have a reputation for... let's just say not hardest working. That didn't come out of nowhere.