← Back to context

Comment by coldtea

17 days ago

A bit strange that you sidestep the video and transcript (which supports the debunking) because it doesn't fit your confirmation bias

The strange thing here is that you've chosen to defend the indefensible on the grounds of trying to "both sides" something that really is only from one side.

  • Not only it's not "indedensible", but the full unedited transcript proves it was perfectly sane.