← Back to context Comment by MarcelOlsz 16 days ago I assume quote retweet. 3 comments MarcelOlsz Reply alfiedotwtf 16 days ago The Onion couldn't even make half of this up without looking like bad writers... but here we are stavros 16 days ago Reality isn't constrained by quality bars. BLKNSLVR 16 days ago Someone quoted this headline elsewhere, so I looked up the actual article[0].It would have been hilarious back in 2001. It's... scarily prescient in 2025. Can satire be just too good?[0]: https://theonion.com/bush-our-long-national-nightmare-of-pea...
alfiedotwtf 16 days ago The Onion couldn't even make half of this up without looking like bad writers... but here we are stavros 16 days ago Reality isn't constrained by quality bars. BLKNSLVR 16 days ago Someone quoted this headline elsewhere, so I looked up the actual article[0].It would have been hilarious back in 2001. It's... scarily prescient in 2025. Can satire be just too good?[0]: https://theonion.com/bush-our-long-national-nightmare-of-pea...
BLKNSLVR 16 days ago Someone quoted this headline elsewhere, so I looked up the actual article[0].It would have been hilarious back in 2001. It's... scarily prescient in 2025. Can satire be just too good?[0]: https://theonion.com/bush-our-long-national-nightmare-of-pea...
The Onion couldn't even make half of this up without looking like bad writers... but here we are
Reality isn't constrained by quality bars.
Someone quoted this headline elsewhere, so I looked up the actual article[0].
It would have been hilarious back in 2001. It's... scarily prescient in 2025. Can satire be just too good?
[0]: https://theonion.com/bush-our-long-national-nightmare-of-pea...