← Back to context Comment by akimbostrawman 17 days ago "destroying and erasing" trans people = not overtly pushing for there spread and acceptance 6 comments akimbostrawman Reply reef_sh 17 days ago Assuming you're actually arguing in good faith, the "erasing" bit has been quite obvious and blatant.https://edition.cnn.com/2025/02/13/us/stonewall-inn-national...Removing people from information about a historical event doesn't look good under any lens. duckfan 17 days ago Doesn't this change make it more historically accurate? In 1969, the year of the Stonewall uprising, the "TQ+" hadn't been invented yet as a cultural concept. The Stonewall Inn was a gay bar and was being targeted for that reason. reef_sh 17 days ago Not really, no, especially considering the involvement of trans people in the event itself.For example, see the section regarding "Zazu Nova" on the current pagehttps://www.nps.gov/ston/learn/photosmultimedia/virtual-fenc...and before the erasurehttps://web.archive.org/web/20250202042345/https://www.nps.g... 3 replies →
reef_sh 17 days ago Assuming you're actually arguing in good faith, the "erasing" bit has been quite obvious and blatant.https://edition.cnn.com/2025/02/13/us/stonewall-inn-national...Removing people from information about a historical event doesn't look good under any lens. duckfan 17 days ago Doesn't this change make it more historically accurate? In 1969, the year of the Stonewall uprising, the "TQ+" hadn't been invented yet as a cultural concept. The Stonewall Inn was a gay bar and was being targeted for that reason. reef_sh 17 days ago Not really, no, especially considering the involvement of trans people in the event itself.For example, see the section regarding "Zazu Nova" on the current pagehttps://www.nps.gov/ston/learn/photosmultimedia/virtual-fenc...and before the erasurehttps://web.archive.org/web/20250202042345/https://www.nps.g... 3 replies →
duckfan 17 days ago Doesn't this change make it more historically accurate? In 1969, the year of the Stonewall uprising, the "TQ+" hadn't been invented yet as a cultural concept. The Stonewall Inn was a gay bar and was being targeted for that reason. reef_sh 17 days ago Not really, no, especially considering the involvement of trans people in the event itself.For example, see the section regarding "Zazu Nova" on the current pagehttps://www.nps.gov/ston/learn/photosmultimedia/virtual-fenc...and before the erasurehttps://web.archive.org/web/20250202042345/https://www.nps.g... 3 replies →
reef_sh 17 days ago Not really, no, especially considering the involvement of trans people in the event itself.For example, see the section regarding "Zazu Nova" on the current pagehttps://www.nps.gov/ston/learn/photosmultimedia/virtual-fenc...and before the erasurehttps://web.archive.org/web/20250202042345/https://www.nps.g... 3 replies →
Assuming you're actually arguing in good faith, the "erasing" bit has been quite obvious and blatant.
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/02/13/us/stonewall-inn-national...
Removing people from information about a historical event doesn't look good under any lens.
Doesn't this change make it more historically accurate? In 1969, the year of the Stonewall uprising, the "TQ+" hadn't been invented yet as a cultural concept. The Stonewall Inn was a gay bar and was being targeted for that reason.
Not really, no, especially considering the involvement of trans people in the event itself.
For example, see the section regarding "Zazu Nova" on the current page
https://www.nps.gov/ston/learn/photosmultimedia/virtual-fenc...
and before the erasure
https://web.archive.org/web/20250202042345/https://www.nps.g...
3 replies →