← Back to context Comment by ImPleadThe5th 15 days ago It's a vicious cycle. But at the end of the day it's the _company_ that has to entice workers. 3 comments ImPleadThe5th Reply vv_ 15 days ago The _company_ also has to stay competitive to make money. ImPleadThe5th 15 days ago Won't even have a product if you can't convince people to work for you. Believe it or not, its actually the workers who do most of the work. vv_ 14 days ago I don't understand this line of reasoning.If you build a product that is too expensive to be competitive, nobody is going to buy it. You will not earn money and will not be able to pay workers salaries.What is controversial in this statement?
vv_ 15 days ago The _company_ also has to stay competitive to make money. ImPleadThe5th 15 days ago Won't even have a product if you can't convince people to work for you. Believe it or not, its actually the workers who do most of the work. vv_ 14 days ago I don't understand this line of reasoning.If you build a product that is too expensive to be competitive, nobody is going to buy it. You will not earn money and will not be able to pay workers salaries.What is controversial in this statement?
ImPleadThe5th 15 days ago Won't even have a product if you can't convince people to work for you. Believe it or not, its actually the workers who do most of the work. vv_ 14 days ago I don't understand this line of reasoning.If you build a product that is too expensive to be competitive, nobody is going to buy it. You will not earn money and will not be able to pay workers salaries.What is controversial in this statement?
vv_ 14 days ago I don't understand this line of reasoning.If you build a product that is too expensive to be competitive, nobody is going to buy it. You will not earn money and will not be able to pay workers salaries.What is controversial in this statement?
The _company_ also has to stay competitive to make money.
Won't even have a product if you can't convince people to work for you. Believe it or not, its actually the workers who do most of the work.
I don't understand this line of reasoning.
If you build a product that is too expensive to be competitive, nobody is going to buy it. You will not earn money and will not be able to pay workers salaries.
What is controversial in this statement?