← Back to context

Comment by ryzvonusef

17 days ago

I am not ignoring it, That disenfranchisement is deliberate, and NOT as a consequence of voter-ID.

Our government and population WANT to disenfranchise them, we WANT to be bigoted against them, and if photo-ID didn't exist, voter rolls STILL exist and then we would use THOSE to lynch them or whatever.

6 comments

ryzvonusef

Reply
nemothekid  17 days ago

This is hilarious. When it's YOUR government trying to disenfranchise voters, it's deliberate and you can understand that.

When it's America, then it's somehow different. I even laid it out for you clearly that republicans WANT to disenfranchise them, but your prescription is that we need a 25 year plan to offer photo IDs on the cheap.

>and if photo-ID didn't exist, voter rolls STILL exist and then we would use THOSE to lynch them or whatever.

The irony in telling Americans to build a 25 year plan to roll out photo ID when they don't even solve issues for your government. Do you not see how foolish it is to tell Americans to spend time solving a problem that YOU KNOW won't solve the issue of government targeted disenfranchisement? You wrote 500 odd words telling Americans to build a system you just admitted doesn't work to solve the underlying problem.

  • ryzvonusef  17 days ago

    > The irony in telling Americans to build a 25 year plan to roll out photo ID when they don't even solve issues for your government.

    They don't solve issue for us because we deliberate include the bigotry into the system.

    We are bigoted regardless of voter ID.

    But it does solve problems for other countries, like the actually leftist countries in Europe etc.

    And it could solve problems for you.

    Just because we are 3rd world hell-hole doesn't negate the effectiveness of voter-ID.

    We choose to puncture our tyres, doesn't negate the effectiveness of wheels.